EUROPEAN Governments are starting to want to LIMIT the immigration of MUSLIMS. Switzerland, a notoriously xenophobic, racist country that cooperated with the NAZIS, had taken the first step to ban Muslims.

HEADLINES TODAY, SWISS DECIDE TO LIMIT MUSLIM IMMIGRATION. Taking a Surprisingly Progressive stand, the EUROPEAN UNION says 'do that you can forget trading with E.U.' We will punish you! WOW! IF THIS IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER, "BRING IT ON!"
February 2014, Switzerland votes to DENY MUSLIMS right to immigrate there.

Yes, ve are Sviss. Vould You
like some Chocolate with that?

Best selling Author Daniel Silva points out in MOSSAD super thriller "THE ENGLISH ASSASSIN" that Switzerland is super xenophobic, a real Aryan nation and cooperated JOYFULLY with the Nazis. A BANKER DRIVEN SYMPATHY yet the whole country has been ultra racist since Swiss Cro Magnons put a bounty on Neanderthals. Switzerland also earned a shameful WWII record of profiteering and collaboration with Nazi Germany which he boldly covers in this important but very entertaining thriller of a novel. Where the ENGLISH ASSASSIN goes after some bad bankers. Silva discusses that plot in
http://www.bookbrowse.com/author_interviews/full/index.cfm/author_number/730/daniel-silva

        USA'S RACIAL IMMIGRATION POLICY "The mythology of Immigration" by blogger Sam Smith
        It is taken as a given in the immigration debate that our current system for dealing with the
       issue has some sort of historical logic. It doesn't. The story of immigration in the U.S. is a mishmash of hospitality
       and hatred, encouragement and restriction.

       The Naturalization Act of 1790, for example, said that "any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to
       become a citizen of the United States." Blacks, indentured servants, and most women couldn't be citizens no
       matter where they came from, but the underlying approach to immigration would boggle the mind of today's strict
       constructionists. If you were a free white male, you came, you saw, and you signed up. As the Citizenship and
       Immigration Services describes ti, "the law required a set period of residence in the United States prior to
       naturalization, specifically two years in the country and one year in the state of residence when applying for
       citizenship. When those requirements were met, an immigrant could file a Petition for Naturalization with "any
       common law court of record" having jurisdiction over his residence asking to be naturalized. Once convinced of the
       applicant’s good moral character, the court would administer an oath of allegiance to support the Constitution of the
       United States."

       The essence of immigration as we know it today - i.e. the restriction of immigration - didn't become a major issue
       until the Chinese exclusion Act of 1882, hardly something of which Americans should be proud. This was the
       period of the great post-reconstruction counter revolution during which corporations gained enormous power but the
       rest of America and its citizens lost it.

       The counter-revolution was not only an attack on would-be immigrants, it was aimed at American ethnic groups
       who had proved far too successful at adding to their political clout in places like Boston and New York City.

       Richard Croker, a tough 19th century county boss of Tammany Hall, grew almost lyrical when he spoke of his
       party's duty to immigrants:

       "They do not speak our language, they do not know our laws, they are the raw material with which we have to build
       up the state . . . There is no denying the service which Tammany has rendered to the republic. There is no such
       organization for taking hold of the untrained, friendless man and converting him into a citizen. Who else would do it
       if we did not? . . . [Tammany] looks after them for the sake of their vote, grafts them upon the Republic, makes
       citizens of them."

       Alexander B. Callow Jr. of the University of California has written that Boston pol Martin Lomansey even met every
       new immigrant ship and "helped the newcomers find lodging or guided them to relatives. James Michael Curley set
       up nationalization classes to prepare newcomers for the citizenship examination . . . Friendly judges, anticipating
       election day, converted their courts into naturalization mills, grinding out a thousand new Americans a day. . . .
       Flags were waved, prose turned purple, celebrations were wild on national holidays. . . . Patriotism became a
       means for the newcomer to prove himself worthy."

       By 1891 the federal government had assumed control of admitting or rejecting all immigrants and one year later
       Ellis island opened. By 1903 we had a law restricting Mexican laborers and during and after World I, laws were
       expanded greatly including a ban on all Asians save the Japanese.

       We did not have the equivalent of a green card until 1940 and the actual card of that name only came in during the
       anti-communist hysteria of the 1950s. What we think of as our immigration system is in no small part a leftover
       from the McCarthy era.

       It is common today to discuss immigration as though it were primarily an employment and economic matter. The
       trouble with this claim is that many of the people who are most anti-immigration are the same who have caused
       infinitely more economic harm to the country through globalization and outsourcing.

       In truth, what really scares the exclusionists is the politics of immigrants, potentially more progressive than they
       would like. From Nordic populists in the northern middle west to European socialists, to the right immigration has
       meant left.

       This, of course, isn't always true as in the case of Cuba but it helps to make the debate a bit clearer to understand
       what it is about.

       In the end, we don't really have an immigration policy but an exclusion policy, outsourcing our prejudices by not
       letting their targets enter the country. "

Our POSTER is ANITA SANDS HERNANDEZ, Los Angeles Writer, Futurist and Astrologer. Catch up with her websites TRUTHS GOV WILL HIDE & NEVER TELL YOU, also The FUTURE, WHAT'S COMIN' AT YA! & HOW TO SURVIVE the COMING GREAT DEPRESSION, and Secrets of Nature, HOLISTIC, AFFORDABLE HEALING. Also HOW TO LIVE on A NICKLE, The FRUGAL PAGE.* Anita is at astrology@earthlink.net Get a 35$ natal horoscope "my money/future life" reading now + copy horoscope as a Gif file graphic!

<=== BACK TO TRACKING THE ECONOMY, an INDEX PAGE

<===BACK TO MONEY SECRETS ONLY THE EXPERTS KNOW

<=== BACK TO SECRETS THE GOV DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW

<------ BACK TO THE COMING EVEN BIGGER MELTDOWN INDEX.

<=== SHOW ME THE FIX FOR AMERICA, AN INDEX PAGE.

<== SHOW ME THE HAPPY R)EVOLUTION PAGE

<=== BACK TO "GUERILLA CAPITALISM" -- THE SOLUTION!

<=== BACK TO REAL CAUSES OF THE MELTDOWN

<------BACK TO THE VULTURE SANDWICH, YOU CAN FIX WORLD STARVATION

<===BACK TO THE TAXES WE SEE AND THE TAXES WE DON'T SEE INDEX

<------ BACK TO HOW TO STEAL A CORPORATION FROM THE STOCKHOLDERS, ALL CEO'S DOING IT NOW, SO WATCH OUT!

<===BACK TO HOW TO SURVIVE GROWING YOUR OWN FOOD/ FISH / MEAT / EGGS AT HOME

<=== BACK TO THE AMBITION INDEX PAGE

<== BACK TO THE FRUGAL LIFESTYLE TIPS INDEX

       <=== HOW TO START YOUR OWN CHARITY with a FUN PARTY!

           <==== BACK TO COUCH POTATO ACTIVISM, EFFECTIVE AND EASY

            <=== BACK TO ACTIVIST HEROES -- the WEBSITE

            <=== THE VULTURE SANDWICH, HOW TO START A CHARITY, GET YOURSELF AN ANNUAL SALARY FOR IT!

<=== BACK TO THE SECRETS OLIGARCHS HIDE FROM YOU

<== BACK TO THE SNOOKERED INDEX, HOW NOT TO BE ROBBED AND BY WHOM!

<==== BACK TO THE TRUTH ABOUT AMERICA INDEX PAGE & ARCHIVE

<====PORTAL to 7,000 ARTICLES YOU CAN REPUBLISH, FREE, MONETIZE EVEN attracting AD REVENUE to your BLOG

       <====BACK TO THE TRUTH ABOUT MUSLIMS